Seriously....

Seriously, I'd like to know.  I have to believe that the oil in the earth serves an unknown important purpose, and removing it could be very dangerous.  If we remove all the heavy oil, turning it into a weightless gas in the atmosphere, could the planet be lighter in weight and move closer to Mars or the sun?  Sorry for the repeat question, but I'm in hopes of hearing some thoughts.

Violent Natural Disasters

We know that the land masses have moved all over the globe, together and apart.  I imagine this kind of event could be massive.  We assume that nuclear plants are safe, until a natural event that we've never experienced happens.  If the land decides to move, and to do so quickly, it will be violent for those of us on the surface.  In this kind of natural disaster, we don't need the tragedy of radiation poisoning because the  experts didn't foresee or expect the changes of the earth.  We must have a cleaner way!

Looking for Science to Answer Radiation Questions

I still don't see the experts on the news answering where exactly the radiation goes when it is "dispersed", while they point to supposed ignorance of people who think it will hit the coast.  The meaning of the word dispersed, means to be spread out over a large area, not disappear, and it's obvious that they believe it may come here if scientific devices are in place to measure existence.  Although it may no longer be in extremely harmful amounts, where exactly does the dispersed radiation go?  Does any of it have the capability to rise to the ozone layer and eventually deplete it?  Does it stay in the air in dispersed amounts or does it always over time mix with rain?  Does it build up in the clouds, or does the rain remove it from the air?  We do know that it travels, is measurable when it rains and falls to the surface, because levels have been measured in affected areas.  Does it ever truly disappear?   How can they believe this is safe to continue to operate like this?   How can they believe this continues to be safe when it has been happening over and over around the planet where there are nuclear plants?  We don't know how long it stays in the air or clouds or where the rain will spit it to the ground or if it can deplete the ozone.  I can't express how much it scares me to continue to operate these kinds of energy producing facilities, and people shouldn't be considered ignorant to have this fear, especially when the "experts" don't have all the answers.  Our president claiming they don't "expect" any danger to people in America, ought to be opening his mind to the true long term dangers of what continuing release of radiation around the world could do to the people and planet.  We must find a cleaner way!

Dissipating Radiation Clouds?

When radiation dissaptes, it's just being spread over a large area.  It doesn't mean it disappears, so where does it go?  Does it eventually gather in our rain clouds, fall directly to the surface, or rise to the upper layers of the atmosphere?  Isn't it extremely dangerous to assume that something catastrophic on a global scale wouldn't happen and poison everything we need to survive?  The risk doesn't seem worth it to me for the energy produced by the dangerous nuclear plants.  Shut them down!!

Evolution into Bald Green Beings with Black Eyes? (DRAFT)

Could radiation pollution cause the population to evolve into bald green beings with black eyes?  Or if we are faced with eating green fungus over time, because the sun has been blocked out in areas, will we evolve into green beings that have black eyes to see in the dark?  Are we capable of causing our own path of evolution?  It seems to me that it is of very big importance to keep our air, food, and water clean, and the atmosphere rich in oxygen, for not only sustainable survivability, but also the long term path of our very existence and evolution.

Global Warming, "The Sky is Falling", and Comparing Mars

I'm guessing "The Sky is Falling" effect will be in the form of heat.  The atmospheric layers will still exist, just as with Mars.  The surface will be the coolest, (or the warmest), while the upper layers will be hotter - Earth and Mars can be compared this way now.  I'm afraid without significant amounts of oxygen to protect the surface, and considering the amount of gasey pollution we create, I have to believe, we'll end up just like Mars if the power people are not serious in changing the way "business" is done.  My opinion is that the tools to measure all the atmospheric layers, especially the upper layer where it is the hottest, have not been around long enough to show solid data of earth's possible global warming.  I hate to think that by the time the temperature changes reach the surface, it will be too late.  Anyone who thinks it's not possible for a planet to heat up, should take a closer look at Mars and the history it has that we on Earth could eventually repeat.

Can Science Prove the Sky is Falling?

I'm sure that science can prove, if the oxygen producing resources that are on the ground are lessened, the "sky" or atmosphere would fall upon us.  Is oxygen holding it up?  With that in mind, the trees don't grow as big or numerous as they used to, the ocean has a garbage pit the size of texas in it, and the amount of toxic fumes from machinery, autos, and living is probably more than the trees are breathing.  Is "the sky is falling" concept really all childhood stories or should people take a very serious look at what they're doing to this planet and do everything they can to quickly change it?